<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pew Forum&#8217;s Religious Landscape Survey Omits Sikhs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sikhswim.com/2008/02/26/pew-forums-religious-landscape-survey-omits-sikhs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sikhswim.com/2008/02/26/pew-forums-religious-landscape-survey-omits-sikhs/</link>
	<description>Crossing the World-Ocean</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 09:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pew Forum: Why Sikhs were left out</title>
		<link>http://sikhswim.com/2008/02/26/pew-forums-religious-landscape-survey-omits-sikhs/comment-page-1/#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>Pew Forum: Why Sikhs were left out</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sikhswim.com/2008/02/26/pew-forums-religious-landscape-survey-omits-sikhs/#comment-400</guid>
		<description>[...] dedicated readers may remember that in February 2007, I wrote to the Pew Forum regarding the omission of Sikhs in the Religious Landscape Survey. Well, they have finally replied to my query. I&#8217;ve posted the reply below. Thank you to Ms. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] dedicated readers may remember that in February 2007, I wrote to the Pew Forum regarding the omission of Sikhs in the Religious Landscape Survey. Well, they have finally replied to my query. I&#8217;ve posted the reply below. Thank you to Ms. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

